Where Was This Love for George H.W. Bush When He Was President?

Try it you will like it

RUSH: Man, oh, man, I’m watching all of this praise for George H. W. Bush. It’s unbelievable! I can’t help but wonder, where was all this when he was president? All of this love, all this admiration, all of this praise, all of this devotion. What a great guy. What he meant to civility. Where was all this? ‘Cause I’m telling you, it wasn’t there.

And I’m gonna have more audio sound bites today as the program unfolds to demonstrate it. They never covered this man this way when he was alive. They never covered this man this way when he was president of the United States. And we know what they did to his son.

They literally tried to destroy the presidency of George W. Bush just like they’re trying to destroy the presidency of Donald Trump. They even came up with a false rumor. They said that George H. W. Bush had an affair with one of his secretaries. Do you remember this? It was totally untrue. It was during the campaign. It was a massive smear and it was right there in the Drive-By Media.

And this is one of the few times that I saw the Bush family rise up in indignation to stop and oppose this. I mean, when Bush was running for office, there was none of this. There was none of this respect. There was none of this admiration. There was none of this, “Oh, my God. What a great guy, what he means for civility.” They never talked about the contributions to civility that George H. W. Bush made while he was — I’m not kidding, folks. Where was all this?

If this man was this great on reflection, then why wasn’t he covered this way? The reason he’s being covered this way now is because he’s gone. That’s what you have to do to get respected and to be revered by the Drive-By Media, leave, however you do it. Once you’re no longer a factor, that’s when we’ll praise the hilt out of you.

On one hand — and I would be remiss not to admit this — on one hand, it’s nice to see. But, on the other hand, it’s so phony. And it’s so omnipresent that I can’t help but make the observation. I mean, the Drive-By Media is still churning out articles that bemoan the difference between the golden age of civility under George H. W. Bush compared to the nightmare they claim we’re suddenly experiencing under Trump.

Wait a minute. Are you telling me that they’re saying the last time we had any kind of civility was back during George H. W. Bush? What about Obama? I thought Obama was the architect of civility. I mean, they loved Obama. They didn’t think Obama was divisive. They covered Obama the way they’re covering George H. W. Bush, but somehow we have to go all the way back to Bush to find when Washington was civil? What did Bush do that they liked? He lost in 1992.

And even Paul Ryan yesterday, during the ceremonies in the Capitol rotunda where the former president is lying in state, Paul Ryan said what he learned — did you hear this? — what he learned from George H. W. Bush was how to lose. I’ve got the audio sound bite here, and I’ve got ’em separated into stacks. Let me see if I can find this here. Grab sound bite number 16. This is how the Washington establishment likes their Republicans. If you’re Republican, if you’re going to Washington, this should be a guiding lesson for you.

RYAN: He was the first president I had the chance to vote for. And he was the first president to teach me and many of us living in a democracy, sometimes you fall short and that how you handle that, that is just as important as how you win.

RUSH: So he taught me how to lose. I mean, that’s what that means. I also saw George P. Bush, grandson, on CNN today. And he was telling the story of Election Day 1992 in the White House, President Bush called him into his office, “Hey, George P., come on in here, Son.” And George P.’s story was that George H. W. Bush was telling them that, “We’re not gonna make it tonight, Son. We’re gonna come up short.” Meaning, we’re gonna lose reelection. And he was writing notes. George H. W. Bush was writing personal notes to all the people who had worked so hard for him.

And that was the story from George P. Bush, that even in the throes of losing, even in the throes of defeat, President Bush was still reaching out to those who — by the way, that aspect is true; don’t misunderstand. It dovetails with the Paul Ryan. Now, Ryan said much more than this. But I just thought it is newsworthy, if you put everything in context here, the Drive-Bys still write all these articles bemoaning the difference, the golden age — there wasn’t any golden age of civility! This is my point.

My friends, this program started in 1988, August of 1988, right smack-dab in the middle of the 1988 presidential campaign. And I remember what they did to Bush in that campaign. He was down at one point 18 to 20 points to Dukakis. And then the Willie Horton ad comes up, and George Bush didn’t run that ad, had nothing to do with it. Floyd Brown put that ad together.

The original Willie Horton ad didn’t even have a picture of Willie Horton in it. It didn’t mention race whatsoever, but they tried to tie Bush to the ad and claim that he was racist, and this is typical of the Republicans who hate black people. I mean, this is the stuff they were saying about the guy in the ’88 presidential campaign!

They made fun of him for being an out-of-touch elitist. He didn’t know what a supermarket scanner was. I’m sure you’ve heard that story over and over by now. And that was totally manufactured and made up by the New York Times. He did know what a supermarket scanner was.

The details of that story, by the way, if you want to know, the manufacturers of the scanner that Bush was having demonstrated told him that the latest innovation, you could rip up your receipt, you could rip up this or that and our scanner would still recognize it. That’s what Bush was marveling at, not the fact that were scanners out there. He knew there were scanners, but the media, led by the New York Times, tried to portray him as so elite and aloof and out of touch, he had no idea how real people lived.

They gave him grief for driving his cigarette boat during the Gulf War. They gave him grief for playing golf. They gave him grief for recreating too much. They accused him of blood for oil. They accused him of trying to personally profit in the oil business going into Kuwait to kick Saddam out, just like they did of his son. And just like they did Dick Cheney. Remember Halliburton, Dick Cheney only went into Iraq and tried to install his buddies to run Iraq because Cheney personally with his buddies at Halliburton wanted the oil.

Same thing with George H. W. Bush during the first Gulf War and all during the campaign. So I watch this stuff. I literally marvel at it, at the utter hypocrisy. And then you have to ask, why? What is the purpose? And, of course, the purpose is the ongoing and never-ending comparison to Donald Trump.

Look at this. The AP (the Ass-sociated Press) has an article this morning. “GOP Laments Bush’s Death as End of ‘a Culture of Civility.’” The GOP, the Republican Party is out there lamenting the death of Bush because the Republican Party knows that this is the end of civility, and this article says at one point, “[T]he nation’s 41st and 45th presidents shared little in personality or worldview. And beyond personality, the conflicting presidencies underscore just how little remains today of the Grand Old Party that Bush once led.

“Trump’s GOP has undercut long-cherished Republican pillars of free trade, federal spending and environmental protection.” Can I translate this for you? It means (translated), “Bush was a globalist and Trump is a nationalist! Trump is putting America first, and Bush realized there had to be a New World Order with the United States and a big, long table with other nations at the U.N.” Trump has undercut pillars of free trade? He’s rebuilding it, for crying out loud! Not only is he rebuilding it, he’s retitling and renaming it as “fair trade.”

Federal spending? Would somebody tell me when it’s ever gone down? Which party is known for cutting federal spending? (interruption) Well… (interruption) No, no, no. The Republicans never did it, really. They talked about it. Democrats just never talked about it. Republicans always… It was a pillar, and the Republican House in 1994 did balance the budget one year and did create a surplus, and what’d Democrats say we needed to do with it? “We need to get rid of the defense department now! We need to get rid of defense. We need to get rid of all…”

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Another question: Civility. We long for the days when we return to civility, right? That’s what we see we have lost now with the death of George H. W. Bush. But the media never treated George H. W. Bush with civility. They never said these wonderful, glowing things about him when he was alive, when he was a candidate, when he was president. In fact, why did this very same media — some of the very same people who were in the media back in 1988 to ’92 and beyond and are in it today. Why did they back a serial sex abuser over the saint of today, George H. W. Bush, when he ran for reelection? Hmm? If civility was so important, was such a big thing, why’d they back the serial sex abuser and then defend the guy for the next eight years, hmm?

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: By the way, ladies and gentlemen, in another recent example of dignity and civility, the dignified and very civil Patti Davis has written an op-ed in the Washington Post that praised George H. W. Bush for his dignity and compassion. Claimed he never attacked anybody, never said anything negative about anybody, and then castigated Trump for the loss of the presidency’s dignity.

Look, I don’t know, this woman spent so much time attacking her own father when he was president and afterwards. And so did her brother, Ronaldus Magnus’ son! I don’t know if she hated her dad or not. No idea. I don’t know her. But she didn’t accept his name. Blasted her father the entire time he was in the White House, even after he left the White House.

And in her most recent example of dignity and civility, Patti Davis has attacked Trump’s response to the synagogue shooting in Pittsburgh. She told CNN Trump lacks the compassion to comfort the nation, that he doesn’t know how to do it. She’s channeling the late Peter Jennings of ABC News who said the same thing about George W. Bush! That he didn’t know to reach the nation after 9/11.

Isn’t it interesting how no Republican president knows how to do anything until they die, and then they become wonderful. So Trump doesn’t have the dignity, the empathy, he doesn’t care enough about people to really convince anybody he does. And they said the same thing about George W. Bush after 9/11. Mocked him, made fun of him.

And so they can be as uncivil as they want. They can be as mean-spirited as they want on the left and in the media. They can be as extremist as they want, and then they get to hand out the labels, they get to sit in judgment of who’s civil and who isn’t? Who’s qualified and who isn’t? The death of George H. W. Bush is simply the latest platform example for the Drive-Bys and other leftists to continue assaulting Donald Trump.

And it’s not even limited to this. Slate.com even has a piece attacking Sully, the service dog. I kid you not. I forget the name of the woman who wrote the piece, is castigating anybody and everybody who thinks this dog has anything to do with the Bush family. The dog’s only been there six months. They’re using the dog. The Bushes are using the dog. The dog doesn’t even know what’s going on. The dog is being told to lay next to the casket, it’s what it does, and it’s gonna go back to Walter Reed and it’s gonna be assigned to another serviceman. The dog doesn’t know what’s happening. The dog is being used, and people are foolish if they are investing any emotion whatsoever in this dog.

Now, this is from our friends on the left who own the rights in their own mind to compassion and civility and dignity, being nice and open-minded and tolerant and accepting. And yet they’re so angry and so livid, they even have to spend time writing a piece denigrating a dog. The picture of Sully, named after the airline captain, by the way, that saved that U.S. Airways jet landing in the Hudson River.

Jim McGrath, what a great guy he is. He’s one of the Bush family spokesmen, George H. W. Bush spokesmen, he took a picture of Sully laying next to the casket, which everybody has seen down in Houston, and published the photo. And the left just hates it! They hate anything that humanizes Republicans or conservatives, except when they do it.

See, when they humanize George H. W. Bush, it serves a purpose, that is to demonize Donald Trump. “GOP Laments Bush’s Death as End of a Culture of Civility.” Well, I don’t understand this. Why do we have to go all the way back to 1992 to say that civility ended? What about Bill Clinton? What about Barack Obama? Barack Obama, how do you think Obama feels? All this talk about the lack and the end of civility, and he was president for eight years.

Don’t you think that the left would be crediting — ’cause that’s what they really thought he was, the epitome of sophistication, don’t you know. Sharpest crease in his slacks than anybody that had ever been in the White House, Barack Hussein O. The epitome of refinement, the epitome of good manners, the epitome of a great vocabulary, the epitome of somebody smarter than anybody else. Why is he not being credited with some civility in the White House? I mean, it didn’t all vanish with George H. W. Bush, is my point. Not in their world. Obama was more civil than Bush. They never criticized Obama.