Committee on Foreign Investment May Not Be Able to Handle Its Exploding Caseload
The Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. is often
compared to a black box. Investors may be aware of what it does, but few know
what really goes on inside.
The nine members of the committee, drawn from various
federal agencies, are in charge of reviewing foreign investments to determine
whether or not they may pose a threat to U.S. national security.
Glimpses of the committee’s activities are largely limited to what’s reported in its annual publications and the occasional breaking news story—such as the recent report that the committee wants Beijing Kunlun Tech Co. Ltd. to sell its dating application, Grindr.
It can be difficult to keep up with the committee given limitations on the information that is shared publicly—especially given its obligation to protect investors’ proprietary information as well as information sensitive to U.S. national security. Still, the limited information that becomes available can help inform investors of potential hurdles and costs they may face when seeking the committee’s blessings.
Over the last few years, the number of cases that have come
under review by the committee has increased. Between 2008 and 2016, investigations
tripled to 79 cases from 23. And investigations have since tripled yet again: The
committee conducted more than 230 investigations in 2018. The duration of reviews
have lengthened as well.
The increase in both number and length of reviews has spread
committee members’ resources thin. This increases the likelihood of delay in
reviews and increasing costs for investors. Costs include legal fees, as well
as the opportunity costs of delayed investment.
The slower pace of review—coupled with the uncertainty of getting
a deal approved—has led more businesses to include a Committee on Foreign Investment
in the U.S. clause in their acquisition contracts in case something were to go
These are the concerns of investors. Yet, in Washington, lawmakers
are concerned that the committee is not doing enough, that it should engage in
reviewing more types of investments than it currently examines.
Last year, Congress passed legislation authorizing the
committee to expand its reach. The Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization
Act now allows the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. to review a
wider range of investments that may be of concern to U.S. national security.
This includes investments that may place Americans’ personal identifying
information at risk (like Grindr) or create new cybersecurity vulnerabilities
Inc.). The act also expanded the definition of what constitutes “foreign
As a result of these legislative changes, the committee
expects its annual caseload to quadruple,
to over 1,000. If the committee lacks sufficient resources to deal with this
significant increase in investment reviews, it could be costly for investors.
It could also have a lagging effect on this administration’s wish to increase
foreign investment in the U.S. Neither outcome would be good for U.S. economic
So how can investors be confident that the committee will
get the resources it needs?
While not a perfect measure, the annual budget request of
each member’s agency is one possible indicator.
Below is a snapshot of requests from Committee on Foreign
Investment in the U.S. members to become compliant with the Foreign Investment
Risk Review Modernization Act:
The Department of
the Treasury is requesting an additional $5 million to become complaint
with the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act. It spent $6 million
in fiscal year 2018 on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S., $15
million in fiscal year 2019, and is now looking to spend $20 million in fiscal
of Defense wants an additional $1.4 million. The Pengaton’s Office
for Acquisition and Sustainment spent $3 million in fiscal year 2018 on the
committee. This increased substantially to $22.9 million in fiscal year 2019 in
anticipation of committee reform. Now, the Pentagon is looking to spend $24.3
million in fiscal year 2020.
The Department of
Justice is requesting $1.3 million more than its current $3.7
of Commerce seeks an additional $3.4 million; the Department
of Energy an additional $4.9 million; the Office of the U.S. Trade
Representative an additional $1.1 million; and the State Department
an additional $2.2 million.
Treasury is also requesting $20 million for a committee fund.
Most of that money ($13 million) would go into building a new public-facing
portal and a case management system that will help coordinate and ease the
review process. Another $5 million from the fund would be available to help
fill the funding gaps of other committee members.
Not including what it will cost the Department of Homeland
Security and Office of Science and Technology Policy to become compliant with
the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act, this comes to total of
Treasury expects to offset some of its request with $10 million it projects to collect in committee filing fees—a new aspect of the committee installed by the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act and another potential cost investors should be wary of.
On a more positive note, the Foreign Investment Risk Review
Modernization Act will allow the committee to expedite reviews of seemingly
benign investments so that it can give more problematic investments a thorough
While we may never truly know whether the committee has the
funds it needs, looking at these budget requests is a good place to start.