2nd Whistleblower? But still no IMPEACHMENT
But still no IMPEACHMENT
So why would a second whistleblower come forward? It is simple, yet no one is talking about why. Given the transcript of the telephone call between President Trump and President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy is public, why do the Democrats need more whistleblowers?
Well, this new whistleblower realized he or she has stepped in some government poop. It has been reported that the 2nd whistleblower is an employee of the Central Intelligence Agency. Now wouldn’t a CIA employee know that divulging the contents of heads of state conversations violates 18 U.S. Code § 798? Disclosure of classified information? Let’s see,, hmm,, yep they would know that, and using the whistleblower as a cover is not going to provide immunity from prosecution, but it is all they have left. Divulging state secrets breaks all kinds of laws. Just ask Chelsea Elizabeth Manning
formerly known as a man Bradley Edward Manning. He thought he was going to be a whistleblower but was sentenced to 35 years in prison for espionage against the United States. spend some time in prison before Barack Hussein Obama commuted its sentence.
So now the pucker factor comes into play and the 2nd blower is worried, not only that he/she might go to federal prison, but that they will lose their highly paid job. And when it is all said and done, we will find out that both whistleblowers are in a sexual relationship! It’s just trained speculation on my part, betcha I am right. Either a Peter Strzok Lisa Page sort of relationship,, or same-sex lovers, I am guessing the ladder.
Ok, so now we have 2 whistleblowers, so what is the House of Representatives waiting on? They have not yet voted to even begin a proceeding. Before all 435 members of the House can take up the issue of impeachment, the House Judiciary Committee must assess and vote on the articles of impeachment. These articles of impeachment must address the alleged impeachable offense(s) such as Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. These articles essentially outline the charges that would be brought against the president in an impeachment trial. How can the accused ever prepare a defense if he does not know what crimes he is accused of?
It should work like this -> The House Judiciary Committee would prepare a report, outlining the Constitutional Grounds for Presidential Impeachment. But none of that is ongoing. Probably because The Great Nancy Pelosi is full of
Jerry Nadler but she is not full of Schiff yet, Adam Schiff that is — an extraordinary liar. Nadler is a liar too, but he can’t hold a candle to Shiff in the prevaricator class, Shiff is in a class all his own when it comes to bearing false witness.
I am very surprised that a special investigation by an Independent Counsel has not been suggested.
And, unlike the Mueller mess, this would be a really good situation for an Independent Counsel. One that could look impartially and determine whether Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors, were committed, and by whom.
But the biggest reason that a formal impeachment is not occurring is, once the official process begins the President has subpoena powers too. The same power to summon witnesses and documents as the congress has. And Nancy Pelosi knows that, and they really really don’t want President Trump summoning — under oath people like Adam Schiff, yes he can be brought in for questioning by the President’s attornies.
Have you ever heard of depositions in a legal proceeding? Much worse have you ever had to undergo one of those? You can be asked ANYTHING and you must answer. The opposing counsel can ask ANYTHING they want. Can you imagine how that will go? Summon Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, his son Hunter Biden, oh wow, I can’t wait!! And the Summa Cum Laude — subpoena Barack Hussein Obama! Come impeachment come!
A sure and certain recipe for a Trump re-election in 2020 by an even wider margin. Yes,, please come, impeachment please come!
So will Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib wish come true? on ‘Impeach the Motherf*cker’
By John Hames